Stemless Humeral Prosthesisin Shoulder Arthroplasty:Systematic Review

Authors

  • Rómulo Silva Orthopedics Department; Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho (ULSAM); Viana do Castelo, Portugal Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8273-6593
  • Gabriela Almeida Intensive Care Medicine Department; Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra; Coimbra, Portugal Author
  • Filomena Ferreira Orthopedics Department; Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho (ULSAM); Viana do Castelo, Portugal Author
  • António Barros Department of Surgery and Physiology; Faculty of Medicine (FMUP); Porto, Portugal Author
  • Manuel Gutierres Orthopedics Department; Centro Hospitalar de São João (CHSJ); Porto, Portugal Author

Keywords:

Arthroplasty, Replacement Shoulder, Shoulder Joint/surgery, Shoulder Prosthesis

Abstract

Introduction: Stemless shoulder prostheses were introduced as a new shoulder replacement system designed to reduce the potential risks associated with the humeral component and achieve better functional results by lowering the surgical complication rates. This systematic review aims to assess the latest available published findings regarding stemless shoulder replacement.
Methods: A search in PubMed, Scopus, and Clarivate Web of Science databases was performed, selecting publications that reported the constant score for functional assessment in patients submitted to shoulder arthroplasty with a stem­ less prosthesis.
Results: Three types of shoulder arthroplasties were identified, with a constant score average between 63.4% and 73.3% and with a revision rate average between 2.8% and 3.4%. These results were similar among studies with differ­ ent follow­up duration: 6 months to 9 years.
Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty with stemless prosthesis is very promising with favourable results in the short and medium­terms regarding improvement in the shoulder function, pain relief and patient satisfaction and low rates of complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Neer CS, 2nd. Articular replacement for the humeral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955;37-A:215­28.

Neer CS, 2nd. Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoar thritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1­13.

Berth A, Pap G. Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis: a comparison of the functional outcome after a minimum of two years follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013;14:31­7. doi: 10.1007/s10195­012­0216­9.

Holschen M, Franetzki B, Witt KA, Liem D, Steinbeck J. Is reverse total shoulder arthroplasty a feasible treatment option for failed shoulder arthroplasty? A retrospective study of 44 cases with special regards to stemless and stemmed primary implants. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017;101:173­80. doi: 10.1007/s12306­017­0467­y.

Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:2249­54. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01994.

Hettrich CM, Weldon E, 3rd, Boorman RS, Parsons IMt, Matsen FA, 3rd. Preoperative factors associated with improvements in shoulder function after humeral hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86­a:1446­51.

Iannotti JP, Spencer EE, Winter U, Deffenbaugh D, Williams G. Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:111s­21s.

Davidson PA, Rivenburgh D. Primary shoulder replacement using stemless inlay arthroplasty as a joint preservation alternative. Curr Orthop Pract. 2018;29:237­43.

Gagliano JR, Helms SM, Colbath GP, Przestrzelski BT, Hawkins RJ, DesJardins JD. A comparison of onlay versus inlay glenoid component loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26:1113­20. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.018.

Bohsali KI, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA, Jr. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2279­92.

Chin PY, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Schleck C. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:19­22.

Farng E, Zingmond D, Krenek L, Soohoo NF. Factors predicting complication rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:557­63. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.005.

Habermeyer P, Lichtenberg S, Tauber M, Magosch P. Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:1463­72. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.023.

Habermeyer P, Magosch P. Strategien beim Endoprothesenwechsel der Schulter. Orthopade. 2013;42:542­51. doi: 10.1007/s00132­ ­012­2025­5.

Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B, Teissier J, Zipoli B. Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: radiologic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years'follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:847-52.

Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, Boileau P. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:146-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.001.

Hawi N, Magosch P, Tauber M, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P. Nine-year outcome after anatomic stemless shoulder prosthesis: clinical and radiologic results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26:1609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.017.

Uschok S, Magosch P, Moe M, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P. Is the stemless humeral head replacement clinically and radiographically a secure equivalent to standard stem humeral head replacement in the long-term follow-up? A prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.001.

Constant Cr Fau Murley AH, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160-4.

Schnetzke M, Wittmann T, Raiss P, Walch G. Short-term results of a second generation anatomic short-stem shoulder prosthesis in primary osteoarthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;139:149-54. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3039-1.

Ballas R, Teissier P, Teissier J. Stemless shoulder prosthesis for treatment of proximal humeral malunion does not require tuberosity osteotomy. Int Orthop. 2016;40:1473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3138-y.

Bell SN, Coghlan JA. Short stem shoulder replacement. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2014;8:72-5. doi: 10.4103/0973-6042.140113.

Collin P, Matsukawa T, Boileau P, Brunner U, Walch G. Is the humeral stem useful in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2017;41:1035-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3371-4. E

Churchill RS, Chuinard C, Wiater JM, Friedman R, Freehill M, Jacobson S, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the simpliciti canal-sparing shoulder arthroplasty system: a prospective two-year multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:552-60. doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.15.00181.

Atoun E, Van Tongel A, Hous N, Narvani A, Relwani J, Abraham R, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem. Int Orthop. 2014;38:1213-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2328-8.

Glanzmann MC, Kolling C, Schwyzer HK, Flury M, Audige L. Radiological and functional 24-month outcomes of resurfacing versus stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2017;41:375-84. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3310-4.

Jost PW, Dines JS, Griffith MH, Angel M, Altchek DW, Dines DM. Total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing mini-stem humeral components: technique and short-term results. HSS J. 2011;7:213-7. doi: 10.1007/ s11420-011-9221-4.

Krukenberg A, McBirnie J, Bartsch S, Bohler N, Wiedemann E, Jost B, et al. Sidus Stem-Free Shoulder System for primary osteoarthritis: short-term results of a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:1483-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.057.

Merolla G, Walch G, Ascione F, Paladini P, Fabbri E, Padolino A, et al. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:701-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.016.

Moroder P, Ernstbrunner L, Zweiger C, Schatz M, Seitlinger G, Skursky R, et al. Short to mid-term results of stemless reverse shoulder arthro-plasty in a selected patient population compared to a matched control group with stem. Int Orthop. 2016;40:2115-20. doi: 10.1007/ s00264-016-3249-5.

von Engelhardt LV, Manzke M, Breil-Wirth A, Filler TJ, Jerosch J. Restoration of the joint geometry and outcome after stemless TESS shoulder arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2017;8:790-7. doi: 10.5312/wjo. v8.i10.790.

Schnetzke M, Rick S, Raiss P, Walch G, Loew M. Mid-term results of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis using a short-stemmed cementless humeral component. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-b:603-9.

Teissier P, Teissier J, Kouyoumdjian P, Asencio G. The TESS reverse shoulder arthroplasty without a stem in the treatment of cuff-deficient shoulder conditions: clinical and radiographic results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:45-51.doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.005.

Verstraelen FU, Horta LA, Schotanus MG, Kort NP, Samijo SK, Jansen EJ. Clinical and radiological results 7 years after Copeland shoulder resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis: an independent multicentre retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28:15-22. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2023-8.

Beck S, Beck V, Wegner A, Dudda M, Patsalis T, Jager M. Long-term survivorship of stemless anatomical shoulder replacement. Int Orthop. 2018;42:1327-30. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3779-0.

Szerlip BW, Morris BJ, Laughlin MS, Kilian CM, Edwards TB. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic pressfit short stem. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.012.

Schnetzke M, Coda S, Walch G, Loew M. Clinical and radiological results of a cementless short stem shoulder prosthesis at minimum follow-up of two years. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1351-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2770-2.

Spranz DM, Bruttel H, Wolf SI, Zeifang F, Maier MW. Functional midterm follow-up comparison of stemless total shoulder prostheses versus conventional stemmed anatomic shoulder prostheses using a 3D-motion-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:478. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1835-3.

Schnetzke M, Preis A, Coda S, Raiss P, Loew M. Anatomical and reverse shoulder replacement with a convertible, uncemented short-stem shoulder prosthesis: first clinical and radiological results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137:679-84. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2673-3.

Maier MW, Lauer S, Klotz MC, Bulhoff M, Spranz D, Zeifang F. Are there differences between stemless and conventional stemmed shoulder prostheses in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:275. doi: 10.1186/s128910150723-y.

Mariotti U, Motta P, Stucchi A, Ponti di Sant'Angelo F. Stemmed versus stemless total shoulder arthroplasty: a preliminary report and short-term results. Musculoskelet Surg. 2014;98:195-200. doi: 10.1007/ s12306-014-0312-5.

Levy O, Narvani A, Hous N, Abraham R, Relwani J, Pradhan R, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a cementless short metaphyseal humeral implant without a stem: clinical and radiologic outcomes in prospective 2 to 7 year follow-up study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25:1362-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.017.

von Engelhardt LV, Manzke M, Filler TJ, Jerosch J. Short-term results of the reverse Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS) in cuff tear arthropathy and revision arthroplasty cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135:897-904. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2218-6.

Ballas R, Beguin L. Results of a stemless reverse shoulder prosthesis at more than 58 months mean without loosening. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:e1-6.

Athwal GS. Spare the Canal: Stemless Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Finally Here: Commentary on an article by R. Sean Churchill, MD, et al.: “Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the Simpliciti Canal-Sparing Shoulder Arthroplasty System. A Prospective Two-Year Multicenter Study”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:e28.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009: 151:65-94.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-21

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): January - March

Section

Systematic Review

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Rómulo Silva, Gabriela Almeida, Filomena Ferreira, António Barros, Manuel Gutierres (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Stemless Humeral Prosthesisin Shoulder Arthroplasty:Systematic Review. (2024). Orthopaedic SPOT, 1(1), 29-37. https://orthopaedicspot.com/index.php/journal/article/view/12